<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can &#8216;digital ants&#8217; cripple worms like Conficker and Koobface?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lastwatchdog.com/digital-ants-cripple-worms-conficker-koobface/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/digital-ants-cripple-worms-conficker-koobface/</link>
	<description>on Internet security by Byron Acohido</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 12:59:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Cluley, Sophos</title>
		<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/digital-ants-cripple-worms-conficker-koobface/#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Cluley, Sophos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastwatchdog.com/?p=2884#comment-768</guid>
		<description>This sounds awfully like a variation the concept of &quot;good viruses&quot; that people outside of the mainstream of the anti-virus industry have proposed many times over the last 20 years.

Unfortunately using &quot;good viruses&quot; or &quot;anti-virus viruses&quot; to fight malware is quite a bad idea, for a number of reasons - some technical, some legal, some practical.

Vesselin Bontchev of Frisk Software wrote an excellent paper which discussed the challenges that &quot;good viruses&quot; have to overcome.  As he discusses the issues far more competently and completely than I would in a blog post, I&#039;ll just provide a link. :)

http://www.people.frisk-software.com/~bontchev/papers/goodvir.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds awfully like a variation the concept of &#8220;good viruses&#8221; that people outside of the mainstream of the anti-virus industry have proposed many times over the last 20 years.</p>
<p>Unfortunately using &#8220;good viruses&#8221; or &#8220;anti-virus viruses&#8221; to fight malware is quite a bad idea, for a number of reasons &#8211; some technical, some legal, some practical.</p>
<p>Vesselin Bontchev of Frisk Software wrote an excellent paper which discussed the challenges that &#8220;good viruses&#8221; have to overcome.  As he discusses the issues far more competently and completely than I would in a blog post, I&#8217;ll just provide a link. <img src='http://lastwatchdog.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.people.frisk-software.com/~bontchev/papers/goodvir.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.people.frisk-software.com/~bontchev/papers/goodvir.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

