<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How federal tax incentives could help stem rampant data breaches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lastwatchdog.com/federal-tax-incentives-stem-rampant-data-breaches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/federal-tax-incentives-stem-rampant-data-breaches/</link>
	<description>on Internet security by Byron Acohido</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 12:59:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Pollock, CEO</title>
		<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/federal-tax-incentives-stem-rampant-data-breaches/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Pollock, CEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastwatchdog.com/?p=3157#comment-849</guid>
		<description>Patricia: sorry for the typos: it&#039;s continuump@gmail.com or call me directly: 917-497-5523</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patricia: sorry for the typos: it&#8217;s <a href="mailto:continuump@gmail.com">continuump@gmail.com</a> or call me directly: 917-497-5523</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Pollock, CEO</title>
		<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/federal-tax-incentives-stem-rampant-data-breaches/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Pollock, CEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastwatchdog.com/?p=3157#comment-848</guid>
		<description>Attn: Patricia Titus, CISO Unisys:

The Federal Govt nor private Industry do not deserve tax benefits for their own incompetence over the past 30 years or so. What Executive Mgmt and their BOD&#039;s need to focus on are solutions that are permanent. As for the Federal Govt there are solutions such as our US Navy &amp; AF as well as the Canadian Govt, etc. If  Unisys is  interested in a real STANDARDS based solution  please contact me directly: ontinuump@gmail.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attn: Patricia Titus, CISO Unisys:</p>
<p>The Federal Govt nor private Industry do not deserve tax benefits for their own incompetence over the past 30 years or so. What Executive Mgmt and their BOD&#8217;s need to focus on are solutions that are permanent. As for the Federal Govt there are solutions such as our US Navy &amp; AF as well as the Canadian Govt, etc. If  Unisys is  interested in a real STANDARDS based solution  please contact me directly: <a href="mailto:ontinuump@gmail.com">ontinuump@gmail.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amichai Shulman</title>
		<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/federal-tax-incentives-stem-rampant-data-breaches/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>Amichai Shulman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastwatchdog.com/?p=3157#comment-846</guid>
		<description>At a first glance it looks like a sensible idea. Very similar in essence to the basic idea behind PCI-DSS: be secure pay less commission. However, I donâ€™t think that we have seen throughout the years many successful attempts by governments to promote technology through tax benefits. For example, I donâ€™t think that recycling and green technologies are gaining momentum due to favorable taxation. I think that in reality it will be very hard to tie up the tax benefit to real security value. What will happen is that we will have additional governmental expenses allocated to executing this plan which will eventually allow large organizations to get tax refunds for as large a part of their IT spending that they can make look like â€œsecurity relatedâ€ (e.g. 25% of the time of each IT employee is dedicated to security).

- Amichai</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a first glance it looks like a sensible idea. Very similar in essence to the basic idea behind PCI-DSS: be secure pay less commission. However, I donâ€™t think that we have seen throughout the years many successful attempts by governments to promote technology through tax benefits. For example, I donâ€™t think that recycling and green technologies are gaining momentum due to favorable taxation. I think that in reality it will be very hard to tie up the tax benefit to real security value. What will happen is that we will have additional governmental expenses allocated to executing this plan which will eventually allow large organizations to get tax refunds for as large a part of their IT spending that they can make look like â€œsecurity relatedâ€ (e.g. 25% of the time of each IT employee is dedicated to security).</p>
<p>- Amichai</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

