<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FTC nails Twitter for deceiving users about privacy and security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lastwatchdog.com/ftc-nails-twitter-deceiving-users-privacy-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/ftc-nails-twitter-deceiving-users-privacy-security/</link>
	<description>on Internet security by Byron Acohido</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:38:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calandale</title>
		<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/ftc-nails-twitter-deceiving-users-privacy-security/#comment-1841</link>
		<dc:creator>Calandale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastwatchdog.com/?p=6270#comment-1841</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Federal Trade Commission barred Twitter from misleading consumers about privacy at any point in the next  20 years&quot;

Ok - so they have to promise not to do it again -
BUT only for a limited time? That&#039;s ridiculous.

&quot;When a company promises consumers that their personal information is secure, it must live up to that promise&quot;

...or we&#039;ll make them make another promise? 


&quot;...part of a newly reinvigorated FTC ....&quot;

I&#039;d hate to think about how much LESS
effective they could possibly be.

&quot;To have the U.S. government make this strong of an opinion about a privacy breach is a huge wake up call for American-based companies in this space&quot;

Yeah, they might be forced to promise not
to violate their users&#039; trust, for a limited 
time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Federal Trade Commission barred Twitter from misleading consumers about privacy at any point in the next  20 years&#8221;</p>
<p>Ok &#8211; so they have to promise not to do it again -<br />
BUT only for a limited time? That&#8217;s ridiculous.</p>
<p>&#8220;When a company promises consumers that their personal information is secure, it must live up to that promise&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;or we&#8217;ll make them make another promise? </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;part of a newly reinvigorated FTC &#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d hate to think about how much LESS<br />
effective they could possibly be.</p>
<p>&#8220;To have the U.S. government make this strong of an opinion about a privacy breach is a huge wake up call for American-based companies in this space&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, they might be forced to promise not<br />
to violate their users&#8217; trust, for a limited<br />
time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

