<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The world will spend $14.5 billion in 2009 on software to defend cyber threats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lastwatchdog.com/security-software-purchases-continues-grow-downturn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/security-software-purchases-continues-grow-downturn/</link>
	<description>on Internet security by Byron Acohido</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 12:59:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Pollock, CEO</title>
		<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/security-software-purchases-continues-grow-downturn/#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Pollock, CEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 23:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastwatchdog.com/?p=2957#comment-787</guid>
		<description>Ladies &amp; Gentleman: With all deference to the S/F Industry &amp; including the Cisco Firewalls, etc, there  is &quot;Zero Science&quot; behind 30 + years of this industries experience with Layers 2-7 of the OSI Model. Why not just use your favorite Intrusion Detection S/W and allow our &quot;Trusted Platform&quot; (complies with Common Criteria, OSI Layer One, PCI-DSS, and DARPA 98 Standards) seamlessly and transparently plug into your network. Nothing changes or is modified. Join the Canadian Govt Dept of Public Safety (DHS), The USAF and Navy, Commercial Data Centers, etc who are satisfied clients. Although we are still under everyone&#039;s radar until our launch soon, feel free to email me for an advance peek: continuump@gmail.com Yes, we do use 100% Science to Prevent Breaches by our advanced Autonomics. Simply put, we read your anomaly&#039;s and set points and then in under a millionth of a second move the attacker(s) without there knowledge to the corporate honey pots where they ping away until frustrated or get traced. Meanwhile the ports are protected and the network stays &quot;UP!&quot; Besides that, our Net Administrator sits over the IBM&quot; Websphere, HP&#039;s Openview, etc net Mgt products thus provding &quot;Real Time Net Mgmt.&quot;Also, interoperable today with any Building Mgmt system (i.e., Johnson Controls) and Physical, SCADA, and IP networks. Clients report between 60-80% reduction in Tech support costs and more &quot;uptime..&quot; 
Also, how much are all these endless S/W patches are costing you. If you believe in S/W only solutions, suggest you check out real security experts: References: Roger Schell, Phd &amp; the Shannon Lecture Series, Professor Caeilli,
Dr.s John Michener &amp; Steven Mohan, Snake Oil and Security Claims journal article. By the way, our system is commercially priced with real ROI. Meanwhile the old way is not going to protect you as it&#039;s stricktley reactionary &amp; the enemy has gotten too smart. So try the system NSA can&#039;t sell you but at least gave you the Common Criteria in 1997. We at least have a Licensing program for OEM&#039;s so we together scale up hardening America&#039;s networks.
Sorry, but I don&#039;t blog, but will answer all emails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ladies &amp; Gentleman: With all deference to the S/F Industry &amp; including the Cisco Firewalls, etc, there  is &#8220;Zero Science&#8221; behind 30 + years of this industries experience with Layers 2-7 of the OSI Model. Why not just use your favorite Intrusion Detection S/W and allow our &#8220;Trusted Platform&#8221; (complies with Common Criteria, OSI Layer One, PCI-DSS, and DARPA 98 Standards) seamlessly and transparently plug into your network. Nothing changes or is modified. Join the Canadian Govt Dept of Public Safety (DHS), The USAF and Navy, Commercial Data Centers, etc who are satisfied clients. Although we are still under everyone&#8217;s radar until our launch soon, feel free to email me for an advance peek: <a href="mailto:continuump@gmail.com">continuump@gmail.com</a> Yes, we do use 100% Science to Prevent Breaches by our advanced Autonomics. Simply put, we read your anomaly&#8217;s and set points and then in under a millionth of a second move the attacker(s) without there knowledge to the corporate honey pots where they ping away until frustrated or get traced. Meanwhile the ports are protected and the network stays &#8220;UP!&#8221; Besides that, our Net Administrator sits over the IBM&#8221; Websphere, HP&#8217;s Openview, etc net Mgt products thus provding &#8220;Real Time Net Mgmt.&#8221;Also, interoperable today with any Building Mgmt system (i.e., Johnson Controls) and Physical, SCADA, and IP networks. Clients report between 60-80% reduction in Tech support costs and more &#8220;uptime..&#8221;<br />
Also, how much are all these endless S/W patches are costing you. If you believe in S/W only solutions, suggest you check out real security experts: References: Roger Schell, Phd &amp; the Shannon Lecture Series, Professor Caeilli,<br />
Dr.s John Michener &amp; Steven Mohan, Snake Oil and Security Claims journal article. By the way, our system is commercially priced with real ROI. Meanwhile the old way is not going to protect you as it&#8217;s stricktley reactionary &amp; the enemy has gotten too smart. So try the system NSA can&#8217;t sell you but at least gave you the Common Criteria in 1997. We at least have a Licensing program for OEM&#8217;s so we together scale up hardening America&#8217;s networks.<br />
Sorry, but I don&#8217;t blog, but will answer all emails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Geek Daddy</title>
		<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/security-software-purchases-continues-grow-downturn/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Geek Daddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastwatchdog.com/?p=2957#comment-786</guid>
		<description>&quot;In 2009, consumer security will as usual account for the most revenue, $3.6 billion or 25 per cent of the total market, or 4 % more than 2008.&quot;

That would seem to be the least amount of Revenue.  Thankfully there are still plenty of options available for home computer users to protect their PC&#039;s for Free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In 2009, consumer security will as usual account for the most revenue, $3.6 billion or 25 per cent of the total market, or 4 % more than 2008.&#8221;</p>
<p>That would seem to be the least amount of Revenue.  Thankfully there are still plenty of options available for home computer users to protect their PC&#8217;s for Free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

