<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SMB2 zero-day flaw could expose Vista PCs to Conficker-like worm attack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lastwatchdog.com/smb2-zero-day-flaw-expose-vista-pcs-conficker-like/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/smb2-zero-day-flaw-expose-vista-pcs-conficker-like/</link>
	<description>on Internet security by Byron Acohido</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 12:59:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Price</title>
		<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/smb2-zero-day-flaw-expose-vista-pcs-conficker-like/#comment-2805</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 07:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastwatchdog.com/?p=2705#comment-2805</guid>
		<description>I hope someone does make a worm out of it. These company need to quit hurrying these products out, they do not care, all they see is $$, It is their own fault. I am not saying making a worm is right, I am just saying the companies selling software should make a good product so we dont have these problems to begin with. The people who use these products pay alot of money. If these didnt exist, the same people with stock in these companies wouldnt also be making money off of the antivirus stocks also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope someone does make a worm out of it. These company need to quit hurrying these products out, they do not care, all they see is $$, It is their own fault. I am not saying making a worm is right, I am just saying the companies selling software should make a good product so we dont have these problems to begin with. The people who use these products pay alot of money. If these didnt exist, the same people with stock in these companies wouldnt also be making money off of the antivirus stocks also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bacohido</title>
		<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/smb2-zero-day-flaw-expose-vista-pcs-conficker-like/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>bacohido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastwatchdog.com/?p=2705#comment-718</guid>
		<description>Michael:
Thanks for pointing out the incorrect reference to Windows 2003. I will make the fix.
Byron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael:<br />
Thanks for pointing out the incorrect reference to Windows 2003. I will make the fix.<br />
Byron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael P. Kassner</title>
		<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/smb2-zero-day-flaw-expose-vista-pcs-conficker-like/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. Kassner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastwatchdog.com/?p=2705#comment-717</guid>
		<description>Byron,

I thought that you might like to know that Windows Server 2003 is not affected by this vulnerability. It is certain versions of Windows Server 2008:

Windows Server 2008 for 32-bit Systems and Windows Server 2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 2

Windows Server 2008 for x64-based Systems and Windows Server 2008 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 2

Windows Server 2008 for Itanium-based Systems and Windows Server 2008 for Itanium-based Systems Service Pack 2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Byron,</p>
<p>I thought that you might like to know that Windows Server 2003 is not affected by this vulnerability. It is certain versions of Windows Server 2008:</p>
<p>Windows Server 2008 for 32-bit Systems and Windows Server 2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 2</p>
<p>Windows Server 2008 for x64-based Systems and Windows Server 2008 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 2</p>
<p>Windows Server 2008 for Itanium-based Systems and Windows Server 2008 for Itanium-based Systems Service Pack 2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Oxley</title>
		<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/smb2-zero-day-flaw-expose-vista-pcs-conficker-like/#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>David Oxley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastwatchdog.com/?p=2705#comment-715</guid>
		<description>Yet another argument for responsible disclosure: if you don&#039;t know your own exploit well-enough to know just how dangerous it might be!

Curious to see where this goes in the coming weeks. For the love of God, let there not be another worm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another argument for responsible disclosure: if you don&#8217;t know your own exploit well-enough to know just how dangerous it might be!</p>
<p>Curious to see where this goes in the coming weeks. For the love of God, let there not be another worm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

