<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SMB2 zero-day flaw could expose Vista PCs to Conficker-like worm attack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lastwatchdog.com/smb2-zero-day-flaw-expose-vista-pcs-conficker-like/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/smb2-zero-day-flaw-expose-vista-pcs-conficker-like/</link>
	<description>on Internet security by Byron Acohido</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:59:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bacohido</title>
		<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/smb2-zero-day-flaw-expose-vista-pcs-conficker-like/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>bacohido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastwatchdog.com/?p=2705#comment-718</guid>
		<description>Michael:
Thanks for pointing out the incorrect reference to Windows 2003. I will make the fix.
Byron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael:<br />
Thanks for pointing out the incorrect reference to Windows 2003. I will make the fix.<br />
Byron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael P. Kassner</title>
		<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/smb2-zero-day-flaw-expose-vista-pcs-conficker-like/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. Kassner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastwatchdog.com/?p=2705#comment-717</guid>
		<description>Byron,

I thought that you might like to know that Windows Server 2003 is not affected by this vulnerability. It is certain versions of Windows Server 2008:

Windows Server 2008 for 32-bit Systems and Windows Server 2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 2

Windows Server 2008 for x64-based Systems and Windows Server 2008 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 2

Windows Server 2008 for Itanium-based Systems and Windows Server 2008 for Itanium-based Systems Service Pack 2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Byron,</p>
<p>I thought that you might like to know that Windows Server 2003 is not affected by this vulnerability. It is certain versions of Windows Server 2008:</p>
<p>Windows Server 2008 for 32-bit Systems and Windows Server 2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 2</p>
<p>Windows Server 2008 for x64-based Systems and Windows Server 2008 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 2</p>
<p>Windows Server 2008 for Itanium-based Systems and Windows Server 2008 for Itanium-based Systems Service Pack 2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Oxley</title>
		<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/smb2-zero-day-flaw-expose-vista-pcs-conficker-like/#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>David Oxley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastwatchdog.com/?p=2705#comment-715</guid>
		<description>Yet another argument for responsible disclosure: if you don&#039;t know your own exploit well-enough to know just how dangerous it might be!

Curious to see where this goes in the coming weeks. For the love of God, let there not be another worm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another argument for responsible disclosure: if you don&#8217;t know your own exploit well-enough to know just how dangerous it might be!</p>
<p>Curious to see where this goes in the coming weeks. For the love of God, let there not be another worm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
