<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unstoppable new phishing attacks blanket Facebook, Twitter, Hotmail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lastwatchdog.com/unstoppable-phishing-attacks-blanket-facebook-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/unstoppable-phishing-attacks-blanket-facebook-twitter/</link>
	<description>on Internet security by Byron Acohido</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:59:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: antihacker101</title>
		<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/unstoppable-phishing-attacks-blanket-facebook-twitter/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator>antihacker101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastwatchdog.com/?p=3392#comment-1397</guid>
		<description>made 1 mistake,  dec 9 - 15   was meant to be feb 9 - 15 2010  THIS MONTH.  I KNOW THIS CAUSE AGAIN 1 MACHINE BLUESCREENED THEN 4 DAYS LATER, MY OTHER...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>made 1 mistake,  dec 9 &#8211; 15   was meant to be feb 9 &#8211; 15 2010  THIS MONTH.  I KNOW THIS CAUSE AGAIN 1 MACHINE BLUESCREENED THEN 4 DAYS LATER, MY OTHER&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antihacker101</title>
		<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/unstoppable-phishing-attacks-blanket-facebook-twitter/#comment-1396</link>
		<dc:creator>antihacker101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastwatchdog.com/?p=3392#comment-1396</guid>
		<description>after 2 years of saying whats going on, i would assume i would have gotten at least 1 response.  im scared about whats to happen if not already.  i been fighting original botnet hacker that took over since aug 2008.   his main intent was to install an undetectable backdoor(conficters as decoys).    it was successfull till a week after april first when i got the info out onto a community site about the hacker&#039;s info and intent.  he paniced and tried to shut down the worm.  it failed ,do to priority of case select commands.  so then i found info that he was training kiddie hackers to use the botnet to take blame while he backs out.  whats scary is that nov 15 - 17 is the dates he used to alter graphic drivers(ttf/color codes) that resulted in blackscreens(for a second), reboot loops(safemode) that was blamed on a patch.  followed by port 445 of the 2000per hour ip ports changed.  followed by msft and dns joint forces in my machines.      

this happened again dec 9 - dec 15(not sure after) where bluescreens were involved but parts of  the worm&#039;s interceptions were being removed that allowed hidden parts to be seen.  
this seems good, but at the same time, i got calls from everyone and my water delivery guy mentioned what strangers also said(all in montana) complained about parts of the worm that i got over 2 years ago when it started.

i wrote the situations in ot her logs(tired),  but if im correct, then think of 1 botnet command and control pinging over 2000 per hour for years on end, and multiply what yall viewed by 02134809834039483094.  if this happens, it will be worse.  i hope im wrong.  this may happen next febuary if it wasnt this febuary.   the only way i know to detect if your machines are pinging is to buy a HUB(cradlepoint) is my favorite due to the clearity of logs), and view logs.   youll notice that it alters its stradegy every other day.  one day random ips, the next day will show the icmp packets and all sorts of things.

if you must know the source of the sites used, for me, the hacker(windstream client) aka windstream.net(pixel error), linked to a name jeff using a site linked with aloha.net used a link tracker througth monster.com that listed all the sites that will be in your list.

for me, it was apnic, rr.com, windstream(after he tried to alter to look like a victom), 2 military sites, at&amp;t, mci/qwest/other phone companys, comcast, and lots and lots of others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after 2 years of saying whats going on, i would assume i would have gotten at least 1 response.  im scared about whats to happen if not already.  i been fighting original botnet hacker that took over since aug 2008.   his main intent was to install an undetectable backdoor(conficters as decoys).    it was successfull till a week after april first when i got the info out onto a community site about the hacker&#8217;s info and intent.  he paniced and tried to shut down the worm.  it failed ,do to priority of case select commands.  so then i found info that he was training kiddie hackers to use the botnet to take blame while he backs out.  whats scary is that nov 15 &#8211; 17 is the dates he used to alter graphic drivers(ttf/color codes) that resulted in blackscreens(for a second), reboot loops(safemode) that was blamed on a patch.  followed by port 445 of the 2000per hour ip ports changed.  followed by msft and dns joint forces in my machines.      </p>
<p>this happened again dec 9 &#8211; dec 15(not sure after) where bluescreens were involved but parts of  the worm&#8217;s interceptions were being removed that allowed hidden parts to be seen.<br />
this seems good, but at the same time, i got calls from everyone and my water delivery guy mentioned what strangers also said(all in montana) complained about parts of the worm that i got over 2 years ago when it started.</p>
<p>i wrote the situations in ot her logs(tired),  but if im correct, then think of 1 botnet command and control pinging over 2000 per hour for years on end, and multiply what yall viewed by 02134809834039483094.  if this happens, it will be worse.  i hope im wrong.  this may happen next febuary if it wasnt this febuary.   the only way i know to detect if your machines are pinging is to buy a HUB(cradlepoint) is my favorite due to the clearity of logs), and view logs.   youll notice that it alters its stradegy every other day.  one day random ips, the next day will show the icmp packets and all sorts of things.</p>
<p>if you must know the source of the sites used, for me, the hacker(windstream client) aka windstream.net(pixel error), linked to a name jeff using a site linked with aloha.net used a link tracker througth monster.com that listed all the sites that will be in your list.</p>
<p>for me, it was apnic, rr.com, windstream(after he tried to alter to look like a victom), 2 military sites, at&amp;t, mci/qwest/other phone companys, comcast, and lots and lots of others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bacohido</title>
		<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/unstoppable-phishing-attacks-blanket-facebook-twitter/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>bacohido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastwatchdog.com/?p=3392#comment-875</guid>
		<description>In reporting this story, some analysts refered to Bredolab as a &quot;banking Trojan,&quot; while Ryan Olson, of VeriSign iDefense, was insistent that Bredolab is, in fact, a &quot;downloader Trojan.&quot; I asked Ryan to reconcile. Here&#039;s the exchange:

LastWatchdog: What exactly is Bredolab?

Olson: Bredolab is a Downloader Trojan. It&#039;s primarily a gateway for other malware. The process occurs when an attacker installs a downloader Trojan to get a foothold on a system. Once the downloader is there, it contacts a command and control (C&amp;C) server which tells it what additional malware it should download and install. This might be a banking Trojan like Zeus, a spam bot like Waledac, or maybe a Rogue anti-virus program. The key is, once a downloader is on the system. the attacker can install anything they choose! Most of the time, that is often multiple Trojans, not just one, which obviously leads to more issues.
 
LastWatchdog: I could not find anything about the Glacial Dracon banking trojan. Can you send me some info on that one? Is it widespread or obscure? Is it similar to Zbot/ZeuS? What&#039;s distinctive about it?

Olson: As far as we can tell Glacial Dracon (GD) is not very widespread. The variants we&#039;ve analyzed have  primarily been targeting Spanish banks. It doesn&#039;t really do anything special compared to other banking Trojans. GD steals POST requests and is capable of HTML injection, but that&#039;s getting to be pretty standard. We&#039;ve seen some C&amp;C servers that both a GD Trojan and a ZeuS Trojan will report to, indicating that some attackers use both Trojans at once, or at least try them both out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reporting this story, some analysts refered to Bredolab as a &#8220;banking Trojan,&#8221; while Ryan Olson, of VeriSign iDefense, was insistent that Bredolab is, in fact, a &#8220;downloader Trojan.&#8221; I asked Ryan to reconcile. Here&#8217;s the exchange:</p>
<p>LastWatchdog: What exactly is Bredolab?</p>
<p>Olson: Bredolab is a Downloader Trojan. It&#8217;s primarily a gateway for other malware. The process occurs when an attacker installs a downloader Trojan to get a foothold on a system. Once the downloader is there, it contacts a command and control (C&#038;C) server which tells it what additional malware it should download and install. This might be a banking Trojan like Zeus, a spam bot like Waledac, or maybe a Rogue anti-virus program. The key is, once a downloader is on the system. the attacker can install anything they choose! Most of the time, that is often multiple Trojans, not just one, which obviously leads to more issues.</p>
<p>LastWatchdog: I could not find anything about the Glacial Dracon banking trojan. Can you send me some info on that one? Is it widespread or obscure? Is it similar to Zbot/ZeuS? What&#8217;s distinctive about it?</p>
<p>Olson: As far as we can tell Glacial Dracon (GD) is not very widespread. The variants we&#8217;ve analyzed have  primarily been targeting Spanish banks. It doesn&#8217;t really do anything special compared to other banking Trojans. GD steals POST requests and is capable of HTML injection, but that&#8217;s getting to be pretty standard. We&#8217;ve seen some C&#038;C servers that both a GD Trojan and a ZeuS Trojan will report to, indicating that some attackers use both Trojans at once, or at least try them both out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xeniar</title>
		<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/unstoppable-phishing-attacks-blanket-facebook-twitter/#comment-874</link>
		<dc:creator>xeniar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastwatchdog.com/?p=3392#comment-874</guid>
		<description>Hi Byron, you might appreciate Tony Greenberg&#039;s thoughts about trust in the IT world... at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onlytimebuystrust.com/2009/10/24/only-time-buys-trust/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.onlytimebuystrust.com/2009/10/24/only-time-buys-trust/&lt;/a&gt;
Greetings from SF, X</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Byron, you might appreciate Tony Greenberg&#8217;s thoughts about trust in the IT world&#8230; at <a href="http://www.onlytimebuystrust.com/2009/10/24/only-time-buys-trust/" rel="nofollow">http://www.onlytimebuystrust.com/2009/10/24/only-time-buys-trust/</a><br />
Greetings from SF, X</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Touchette</title>
		<link>http://lastwatchdog.com/unstoppable-phishing-attacks-blanket-facebook-twitter/#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Touchette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastwatchdog.com/?p=3392#comment-867</guid>
		<description>Just an update - Over night we saw a retort of sorts from the Bredo botnet with their simple text, Facebook themed malware. This one once again uses the &quot;password changed&quot; ruse, and contains a malicious .Zip attachment.

Zues on the other hand, is still chugging along today utilizing now 57 domains on which they host their malware. We have seen rates on some of these domains jump up to 1600/minute, on average across all domains. We are seeing roughly 50,000 of these messages every minute with over 7 million total piled up in our filters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just an update &#8211; Over night we saw a retort of sorts from the Bredo botnet with their simple text, Facebook themed malware. This one once again uses the &#8220;password changed&#8221; ruse, and contains a malicious .Zip attachment.</p>
<p>Zues on the other hand, is still chugging along today utilizing now 57 domains on which they host their malware. We have seen rates on some of these domains jump up to 1600/minute, on average across all domains. We are seeing roughly 50,000 of these messages every minute with over 7 million total piled up in our filters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
